O’Connor: Get ‘The Charger Girls’ a labor union like the Teamsters

print page
email
share this
comment
bookmark
text size

I can’t believe it’s legal.

San Diego: (Courtesy Photo)

(Courtesy Photo)

Who’s minding the NFL?

Thanks to a generous brother, I was given tickets to Sunday’s San Diego Chargers vs. Kansas City Chiefs game. I wanted to see why, or if, San Diego needed a new stadium at taxpayers’ expense.

From the opening moments of the Chargers spilling onto the field from the players’ tunnel, to the final moments of the lopsided San Diego victory — I couldn’t believe the talent, the athleticism, the discipline, and the precision…

…of the Chargers cheerleaders!

These women, called “The Chargers’ Girls,” inhaled clouds of smoke while lining the players’ entrance, and kept their pom poms twirling above their heads without dropping a smile.

Throughout the entire first half, they performed arduous and complex dance/jazzercise routines in synchronization that would make Olympians proud.

An often repeated gesture required the cheerleaders to drop their heads (with long, heavy manes of hair) towards the ground, and quickly flip their torsos straight up. In short, a movement that would give most running backs whiplash.

In perpetual motion for the entire half, they never stopped for water, had any coaches offer to ice their knees, or received any real applause from the crowd, even after prompting from the announcer, “Let’s hear it for The Chargers’ Girls.”

These women spent more time on the field than the rather lame Chiefs’ offensive unit.

These women performed like a military drill team. They jumped, twisted, twirled, pranced and performed hyperactive routines in the end zones, sidelines, and in front of the TV cameras.

Surely, they must get paid a decent wage for all this work; auditions, training, workouts, etc.

The San Diego Chargers Girls performed live for crowds of shoppers at Horton Plaza on Black Friday. Immediately following a fashion show took place featuring fashion models escorted down the runway by former San Diego Chargers players. (Video by Steven Bartholow)

They work 10 home games; practice laboriously, and are reminded (on The Chargers’ Girls Web site) that this is a part-time job.

However, the pay is barely minimum wage: $75 a game. They must arrive at approximately the same time as the tailgaters (4 hours before game time at 9 a.m.); and stay until the final moments (around 5 p.m.).

None of this includes practice times, travel times, cost for hair styling, makeup, maintenance of equipment, etc.

However, there are some other perks. They can earn money for “guest appearances,” as well as some free travel.

The New England Patriots sent their “cheerleaders” to Aruba for a 2010 calendar shoot. It is unclear who reaps the profit from those sales.

More by Colleen: California politics includes everybody getting stoned | Palin, Clinton — Coffee on me if you come to San Diego | Seven warning signs for Sen. Barbara Boxer’s re-election

The Buffalo Bills cheerleaders are given “discounted gym memberships.”

And the Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders participated in a reality TV show that demonstrated the steps towards achieving what the Cowboy Web site calls “every girls’ dream.”

I understand that the cheerleaders also get free game tickets, a parking place, and receive exposure to a large television audience during game lulls.

However, none of this seems fair in 2009; when the NFL team owners and players reap millions of dollars in pay and profits. Surely, some of this largesse could be directed to the “Girls.”

Long ago and not far way, San Diego’s Pacific Southwest Airlines’ stewardesses were told to don a new, brightly colored, skimpy uniform, that many women of the 1970s considered offensive and inappropriate attire for their job. At the time, most other airline flight attendants wore business suits.

PSA insisted on the mini skirt uniforms. The Teamsters Union struck the airlines in 1973 and shortly thereafter, secured huge pay concessions for the flight attendants, and the subsequent withdrawal of the “hot pants” uniforms.

If a union is good enough for the NFL players, it should be good enough for “The Chargers’ Girls.” These women deserve better than to work as hard as they do for skimpy wages in skimpy uniforms.

Bring on the Teamsters.

Colleen M. O’Connor is a former college history professor, the director of the “Faces of San Diego 2000″ family photographic history project and co-editor of Eleanor Roosevelt: An American Journey.  She is an SDNN political columnist and can be reached at CoConnor15x(a)Yahoo.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

15 comments

READER COMMENTS

Comment by: Dienekes Posted: November 30, 2009, 8:32 am

Would love to see San Diego fans reaction to Teamster seniority applied to their cheerleaders.

Or better yet, if they strike, will these girls be weilding the baseball bats and axe-handle picket signs?…They might break a nail!

Here’s an oldie but a goodie for you…
___________________________________

A dedicated Teamsters union worker was attending a convention in Las Vegas and decided to check out the local brothels.

When he got to the first one, he asked the Madam, “Is this a union house?”

“No,” she replied, “I’m sorry it isn’t.”

“Well, if I pay you $100, what cut do the girls get?” the Teamster asked.

“The house gets $80 and the girls get $20,” she answered.

Offended at such unfair dealings, the union man stomped off down the street in search of a more equitable, hopefully unionized shop.

His search continued until finally he reached a brothel where the Madam responded, “Why yes sir, this is a union house. We observe all union rules.”

The man asked, “And if I pay you $100, what cut do the girls get?”

“The girls get $80 and the house gets $20.”

“That’s more like it!” the union man said.

He handed the Madam $100, looked around the room and pointed to a stunningly attractive blonde.

“I’d like her” he said.

“I’m sure you would, sir,” said the Madam.

Then she gestured to a 92-year old woman in the corner… “but Ethel here has 67 years seniority and according to union rules…she’s next.”

Comment by: rita Posted: November 30, 2009, 8:33 am

How many of these “cheerleaders” ever get a liveable income?

Comment by: Richard Posted: November 30, 2009, 11:10 am

Ok. So other than an opportunity to look at a picture of cheerleaders, who really cares about this?

Comment by: Anonymoose Posted: November 30, 2009, 12:27 pm

Watching american football is for gays, the cheerleaders are far better athletes. Drop going to overpriced games and take in some cheerleading competitions.

Comment by: Don Holliday Posted: November 30, 2009, 1:04 pm

Colleen- Interesting article, but these girls know what their in for, and apparently, accept it.
They can choose to use their position as a stepping stone to bigger things (not a reference to breast augmentation). If they really wanted to be a Teamster, they would choose to work in a warehouse, or drive a truck. I wish them all well. They ARE entertaining!

Don Holliday
San Diego

Comment by: Vic Posted: November 30, 2009, 1:06 pm

Good God! Social injustice right under our noses! Alert the IWW and sign these gals up immediately if not sooner!

And next time, find some real workers to get steamed about; those might be clerks, bag handlers, cabbies, med techs and nurses, waiters and kitchen staff and maybe even news reporters, too. They need all the help they can get.

Comment by: WHurgin Posted: November 30, 2009, 1:47 pm

so no one applauds for cheerleaders when prompted? Then the verdict is out, no one cares. Cut em lose and lets get on with the real spectacle, the GAME.

Comment by: Peter Posted: November 30, 2009, 3:32 pm

Cheerleading is like semi-pro football, or more accurately, minor league baseball.

Cheerleaders may have aspired to be chearleaders when they were young girls, but the pinnicle of beauty jobs is acting/modeling; that’s where you make the money. And many of those beauties were one-time cheerleaders… Similarly, in baseball, minor league baseball players frequently make $1500/month (8 month jobs) and have to work other jobs in off-seasons to suppliment their incomes so they can chase their major league dream. Where’s the outrage?

Sorry Ms. O’Connor, it’s a lame idea…

Comment by: KM Posted: November 30, 2009, 4:46 pm

So… I guess… according to all you geniuses that had negative post what is happening to these girls is okay. I’ve never really read comments from readers and you have all reminded me why. It’s amazing to me that people think it’s okay to pay people less than minimum wage because other people “would do the work” (Especially while considering these girls are the best of the best). If that’s the case, we should just go ahead and get rid of minimum wage all together… why would we need it???? As Don Holiday would say… “these girls know what they are in for, and apparently accept it.” All of you need to educate yourselves. Maybe then you will realize just because the Chargers are getting away with it now doesn’t mean its right. All of you missed the point of the article.

Bottom line is… the girls deserve more and all of you know it!

Comment by: Ruthie Posted: November 30, 2009, 5:00 pm

Well, is a new stadium at taxpayers expense needed? You got side-tracked from you original mission.

Comment by: phyllis Posted: December 1, 2009, 10:00 am

Great article. SHAME on the NFL for not paying these women more!

Comment by: Christian Pope Posted: December 1, 2009, 10:59 am

As has been said, albeit in poorly written response posts, is that the intangible financial benefits of being a Charger Girl are worth significantly more than $75 per game.

As to the argument that “others would do it instead”, lets keep in mind that hundreds and hundreds of girls don’t just “show up” to the auditions, they practice for years to get themselves ready for a shot at this. Its not a Craigslist cattle call for dishwashers at a restaurant.

And finally, from a practical standpoint of managing the girls, more money = more problems. The girls are already in an environment as competitive as the players. Add to that a significant paycheck and we suddenly get infighting, labor law issues and worst of all, the potential inability to get rid of older girls at the end of the season and replace them with fresh young ones.

Comment by: Gail Findley Posted: December 2, 2009, 11:06 am

Oh my what a great # of responses!!!!!! Usually you are lucky to get one or two. However, it was fun to read and I do agree that for the short period of time in their lives they provide this entertainment, they should be better paid.
Now that I said that, why don’t all of you people respond when Colleen writes her other articles?
What about the stadium? Is it ok, or not?

Comment by: RC Posted: December 6, 2009, 12:42 pm

Yep, them poor old cheerleaders have nothing to look forward to do they?
Look at Paula Abdul, she was a former cheerleader for the LA Lakers.
If the girls are savvy, they will monopolize on their positions and make good money from it.

Comment by: George Posted: December 15, 2009, 2:23 pm

RC - Paula Abdul is 1 in a million. Name 10 other financially successful former NFL cheerleaders without Googling the answer!

Didn’t think so.

Cheerleaders ought to be treated better.

Post a comment

Presented By: