More than 70 percent of SD sex offenders are violating laws

print page
email
share this
comment
bookmark
text size

More than 70 percent of the registered sex offenders in San Diego County are violating a state law by living too close to schools or parks, it was reported Sunday.

The Watchdog Institute, a nonprofit journalism group based at San Diego State University, analyzed 1,731 released offenders in San Diego County and found 1,266 of the addresses made public by the state are in restricted zones, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

Jessica’s Law, which was approved by California voters in November 2006, toughened sanctions against sex offenders and bars them living within 2,000 feet of a school or park.

The Union-Tribune reported that the law doesn’t specify whether residence restrictions apply to all convicted sex offenders or only to those who were convicted or paroled after it passed. There are no penalties for violating the restrictions.

“The initiative itself was so badly written, no one knows how retroactive it is,” Tom Tobin, a clinical psychologist and member of the state Sex Offender Management Board, told the Union-Tribune.

Four registered sex offenders, two of whom live in San Diego County, have challenged the residency restrictions, and their case is before the California Supreme Court. The court’s ruling is expected in February.

The Union-Tribune reported that dozens of municipalities across the state that have approved their own ordinances are awaiting the court’s decision before moving to enforce them. In San Diego County, six cities have enacted ordinances that restrict were convicted offenders can live or loiter: San Diego, Chula Vista, National City, La Mesa, Santee and San Marcos.

The county of San Diego and the Padre Municipal Water District — which oversees Santee Lakes — also have ordinances. Each makes a violation a misdemeanor.

Nearly all of those cities increased the number of restricted areas, barring convicted offenders from living or loitering near playgrounds, arcades, amusement parks and other places where children congregate, the Union-Tribune reported.

Still, since Jessica’s Law took effect, more registered sex offenders have identified themselves as transient and are harder to track, the Union-Tribune reported.

Click here for a map of registered sex offenders in California

Among California parolees — the only population of sex offenders for whom the residence restrictions have been consistently enforced — the number listed as transient has gone from 88 in November 2006 to 1,056 in June 2008, an increase of 1,100 percent, according to a Sex Offender Management Board report in December 2008.

Tobin said sex offenders in unstable environment, such as homelessness, are more likely to commit another crime.

“Why would we want to, with no apparent good reason, increase the risk of re-offending,” Tobin asked the Union-Tribune. “The reality is that we’re pushing people to the brink.”

The Institute found that in San Diego, where more than one-third of the county’s convicted sex offenders list addresses, 85 percent are in violation of the state’s residence restrictions. The city ordinance adds further restrictions, barring registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of day-care centers, arcades, playgrounds, and libraries. It also bars them from loitering within 300 feet of those places.

The City, reported the Union-Tribune, hasn’t enforced its ordinance, passed in 2008, because of the pending case before the California Supreme Court. Officials in the City Attorney’s Office also wouldn’t discuss enforcement plans because the case isn’t resolved, city spokesperson Gina Coburn told the Union-Tribune.

This story was written and edited by City News Service.

Tags: , ,

6 comments

READER COMMENTS

Comment by: sheeplehead Posted: November 30, 2009, 5:10 am

More hype for internet hits and circulation? Will the “news network” bury it’s head in the sand when they do just a tiny bit of reasearch and discover that residency restrictions have nothing to do with re offence rates?

Comment by: Shelomith Stow Posted: November 30, 2009, 6:16 am

Thank you for a fair and informative article. Mr. Tobin appears to be light-years ahead of others in his position and related positions as the majority of the thinking appears to embrace the totally nonsensical theory that if every known sex offender, regardless of his offense, is kept as far away from children as possible, those children will be safe. The havoc wreaked on the lives of offenders, most with totally non-violent and non-child oriented offenses, and on their innocent families is brushed aside with a “take ‘em all out and shoot ‘em” mentality. Hopefully the upcoming cases in the California Supreme Court will end in favorable rulings, taking us one step further in the elimination of the “sex offender” as the new sub-class of human beings in America.

Comment by: Ann Posted: December 1, 2009, 3:53 pm

No wonder we are reading about horrific crimes committed by paroled sex offenders, such as the one that held the girl captive for 18 years and the one with dead bodies all over his property. Law enforcement is distracted by trying to enforce laws that are unnecessary and counterproductive. They are forced to police and monitor the majority of offenders who never touched a child or forced a woman.

Comment by: Matt - RSOL/CC Posted: December 3, 2009, 3:09 pm

Sex offender residency restriction laws only cause problems for law enforcement…

“Seattle police detective Bob Shilling, a nationally recognized expert on sex offenders,noted that Seattle’s residency restriction law “creates a lot more homeless sex offenders, which makes it a lot harder for us to work. In fact, it exacerbates the problem.”

Worse still, the laws do not have any effect on re-offenses…

The California Research Bureau released a report in 2006 that said “there is little research regarding the effectiveness of restricting the housing locations available to sex offenders,
but the few studies available find they have no impact on re-offense rates.

Quotes from “How Sex Offense Registries Fail Youth and Communities,” Justice Policy Institute.

Comment by: Keith Richard Radford Jr Posted: December 6, 2009, 5:39 am

Any act is debatable; astoundingly this has been allowed to go on this long. The disgust come from prejudice not even being able to discuss the issue by ones own internal wiring like a maze of mixed nerve ending unable to function, the mind shuts down unable to have empathy for the situation like any rational issue. We don’t even have laws that make since or definitions that work within those laws. We still want people to say they are mentally ill for having sex. Sex is nor will ever be the end of life in fact its necessary for our continued existence. The paradigm is better heard through the conflict of religions where people acutely kill one another over sex, but the message is the same. We have painted opinion with blood for far too long when the money is spent on punishment to the delight of the enforcers while the enforcers are exempt from their own laws which have no definition anymore. We still want people to say they are mentally ill for having sex, or not, when the inclination is to bow to authority sex often times becomes rape. I once had a woman ask if I was propositioning her by throwing pennies at her when I just wanted her to go away. Till we see its something like headaches/backaches too someone who has never had one, and once we have we start thinking allot about what really matters in life and how so many can spend OUR lives fighting amongst THEMSELVES over things that really don’t amount to a hill of frijoles. It is just a permanent under class designed by those who have been in control of everything for the wrong reasons too long.

Comment by: samuelstorns Posted: December 9, 2009, 9:31 pm

Sex offender registration laws are a microcosm of whats wrong with our entire system. The original intent of the law was to register the most dangerous sex offenders yet we include people and teens who have consensual sex, prostitutes, streakers, public urniators, teen sexters and misdemeanors on our lists. Anyone scared of people in that list? Are these people we think of when we hear the term “sex offender?” When is the last time we heard of a heinous crime commited by someone convicted in the above list? This is why we have the highest incarceration rate of any country in the world because we feelthe need to jail so many for so little. Why should sex offender registration laws be any different?

Post a comment

Presented By: