Salm: Schemmel’s resignation raises one giant question

Former SDSU athletic director resigned last week amid allegations of improper expense reports. (AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi)
There’s a phrase that ought to be an embedded save string. It should come with every word-processing software package. Hell, there should be a key devoted to it on the keyboard. (In place of that vexatious INSERT key, maybe. Make that, definitely.)
Figurative drum roll, please:
“What the hell was he thinking?”
Humbling as it may be to confess a total lack of empathy, last week I was gobsmacked yet again by the incomprehensible behavior of a human being. In this case, that of (now former) SDSU athletic director Jeff Schemmel. Seems Mr. Schemmel requested reimbursement for travel funds he most certainly did not spend in pursuit of university interests. Instead, he was meeting a girlfriend for a few days of R&R.
Which is understandable. Not commendable, certainly, but you can see where he was coming from, or, more specifically, what he was going for. He’s married, but it happens, and it’s none of my business, none of yours, and none of the university’s.
But then he had to go and expense the damn thing, just to save a few hundred bucks. Now, God knows, we could all use another few hundred bucks. But Schemmel was earning $257,000 at SDSU and was not, to the best of anyone’s knowledge, in up to his eyeballs with anyone named “Fingers” or “Louie the Weasel.” So why risk it all for chump change?
What the hell was he thinking?
Almost an aside, but pretty close to on-topic, actually: A close acquaintance I trust was once a higher-up in the athletic department of a large university. He told me that one of the coaches was caught falsifying lunch receipts. The guy wasn’t just claiming they were business lunches when they weren’t — he had gotten hold of a blank receipt book from a restaurant, and over the course of a year he expensed about 50 non-existent meals. This was the coach of a major sport, at a major university; he was probably making better than $500,000. The university fired him for another, more public offense, and the coach went on to other universities and other scandals.
See related: SDSU athletic director Jeff Schemmel resigns amid controversy | Hacksaw: SDSU’s Schemmel deserved a second chance | More from Arthur Salm in Opinion
What the hell was he thinking?
You have to ask the same question of a multi-millionaire tax cheat. Now, let’s pass over the intensely moral argument that this is someone who made his stash by living and working in a society that provided the structure that allowed his fortune to be manifested in the first place, and that guaranteed — and continues to guarantee — the safety of his operation, his funds and investments, and his person. Therefore, it seems more than reasonable to assert that he owes that same society a considerable debt, which he should be delighted — no, I really mean delighted — to make good in the form of paying hefty taxes.

Arthur Salm is an SDNN columnist.
But we’re just going to let that go. No, the puzzlement here is, the guy’s already made his fortune. Why put it on the line — put a cartridge in the six-shooter, give it a spin, place it to the temple, and pull the trigger — in an attempt to hold on to a few thousand, or tens of thousands, or even tens of millions of simoleons that he doesn’t even need? ![]()
If (when) I make my big score, here’s a speech I’m going to make to my accountant, bookkeeper, CFO … whatever you call those people in charge of all the money, which is something I don’t really understand, which maybe goes a long way toward explaining why I haven’t made that big score. Anyway, here’s the speech:
“I’ve got mine now, and then some. And do you know what that allows me to do? It allows me to sleep at night. Not with a clear conscience, mind you, because if you only knew what I had to do to accumulate … Well, that’s neither here nor there.
“Anyway, the point is, I do not want to have to worry for one instant about the IRS, or the SEC, or even, for that matter, the WCTU.* Take whatever deductions I’m clearly and unambiguously entitled to, but in the end, I pay what I owe. No shady deals, anywhere. Nothing under the table, nothing around the table, nothing tucked away in a hidey-hole in a leg of the table. I’ve got a nice place here — do you like the atrium? I designed it myself — and I don’t want to have to enjoy it vicariously from a cell in a federal pen.”
But guys like him risk it all for a few dollars more. And some of them do indeed go to prison.
Or lose their $257,000 jobs and their reputations.
Just what the hell are they thinking?
*WCTU — Women’s Christian Temperance Union, founded in 1873, dedicated to promoting abstinence from alcohol, and the kicker to a verse in the Chad Mitchell Trio’s “The John Birch Society”: “Join the John Birch Society/There’s so much to do/Have you heard they’re serving vodka at the WCTU?”
Arthur Salm is an SDNN columnist.
Tags: Arthur Salm, athletic director, Jeff Schemmel, opinion, question, resignation, SDNN, SDSU
READER COMMENTS
- Suspicious object prompts school evacuation
72 - Adam Lambert: Get the birthday cake ready
38 - Hemet woman arrested after Bank of America robbed
36 - Teachable Moments: Sally Smith off Serra site council at packed meeting
29 - Tickets still available for Adam Lambert's Indio concert
29 - Lake Elsinore teen, 13, killed after being struck by pickup
29 - Menifee USD pulls dictionaries due to explicit word
25 - Salm: Think our teachers are doing a lousy job? You try doing it
24 - Feds: Phony U.S. Marshal made it into S.D. airport with 'prisoner'
22 - Opponents to high-speed rail route through Rose Canyon stand firm
19
- Dubai tower closed a month after opening The world's tallest skyscraper has unexpectedly closed to the public a month after its lavish opening.
- Super Bowl surpasses M.A.S.H. as most-watched show ever The New Orleans Saints' victory over Indianapolis in the Super Bowl was watched by more than 106 million people, surpassing the 1983 finale of "M-A-S-H" to become the most-watched program in U.S. television history, the Nielsen Co. said Monday.
- Pacific Ridge School raises walls of new high school With enrollment expected to increase by about 30 percent by next fall, Pacific Ridge School, a private school in Carlsbad, erects the walls of a permanent, 32,000-square-foot, energy-efficient facility for its high school.
- Chaparral HS 'parent day' brings teens, parents together on campus "We are ecstatic at the turnout, with over 300 parents attending today," said Barbara Burkett, PTSA President for Chaparral.
- Man gets five years for pot growing scheme A 23-year-old man who admitted bypassing a home's electric meter in order to power high-intensity lights to grow at least 100 marijuana plants was sentenced today to five years in prison and ordered to pay $18,000 in restitution to SDG&E.
- Cops chase down woman in stolen car A woman driving a stolen car tried to run a deputy off the road late Monday afternoon while leading authorities on a meandering 20- minute chase that ended with her arrest.
BlogsBlogs‘Twilight’ star wows Temecula teens12 hours ago San Diego at Work BlogElected Officials Sponsor Job Fairs in San Diego12 hours, 54 minutes ago Giving’em the BusinessFinancial fitness: Estate tax planning 2010, or nailing Jell-O to the wall17 hours, 16 minutes ago A More Perfect UnionRotto: A bipartisanship solution could tank health care reform17 hours, 19 minutes ago Culture CruncherSuper Bowl XLIV Commercials: The Best and Worst20 hours ago A More Perfect UnionMeissner: Immigration reform will take serious bipartisanship effort21 hours, 16 minutes ago |
|

Comment by: Cuauhtémoc Q Kish Posted: November 24, 2009, 6:53 am
The answer to Salm’s rhetorical question is a simple one: THEY (and Jeff Schemmel specifically) weren’t thinking at all.
Comment by: Gene B. Posted: November 24, 2009, 11:01 am
In a recent poll, it was determined that a majority of the population wants more and better health insurance. But the same poll showed that they didn’t want to have to personally pay for this and, in fact, they thought a dandy solution to this conundrum would be to increase taxes on the “rich”! Perhaps some of the “rich” have decided that if their fellow citizens chose to elect politicians whose express promise to the electorate is to “redistribute” the wealth, they will fight back by “cheating” on their taxes. Is it any less moral to cheat on your taxes than to have your friends and neighbors conspire with a political Party to pick your pockets on their own behalf?
Not being “rich”, this is pure conjecture on my part…but there is some logic in assuming this could be the motive for such “heinous, self-serving activity” by some of our more ambitious and hardworking citizens.