Salm: Damn, the Chargers won again.

print page
email
share this
comment
bookmark
text size

San Diego: Arthur Salm is an SDNN columnist.

Arthur Salm is an SDNN columnist.

Not that I enjoy walking around with a “KICK ME” sign taped to my back or anything, but I wince every time the Chargers pull one out, and indulge in a so-1980s “YESSSS!” whenever they go down. Which, I’m sure, would be all-in-good-sports-fun acceptable in the intense but benign atmosphere of local fandom; two of my best friends live and die (these days die, mostly) with the Raiders, and are still able to live peaceful San Diego lives. San Diego: sdnn-opinion32

But I want the Chargers to lose even though I haven’t watched football for years, and couldn’t care less about the NFL or the Pac 10 or bowl games or whatever may be the latest fine-tuning of the rules in the eternal struggle to achieve parity between pass receivers and defenders.  (The only equivalent in the infinitely superior game of baseball — Stop kicking me! What, is there a sign on my back or something? — was the lowering of the pitcher’s mound some 40 years ago.)

I burned out on football one Sunday afternoon in college. It was in the Bay Area; as best I can remember it, my roommate and I watched the 49ers game, then a college game, then “This Week in the NFL,” then “This week in the AFL,” then a show on Raiders highlights, then a show on 49ers highlights. I staggered to my bed, collapsed — and all night long was unable to stop the football images playing across my mindscreen.

And I haven’t watched football since, except during that giddy, transcendent era when Dan Fouts made it irresistible. Fourth and one on your opponent’s 40-yard-line? Throw the ball! Third and inches on your own 11? Throw the ball! Yeah! I reveled in exactly the kind of superficial, go-for-cheap-thrills attitude I despise when I see it in a baseball fan.

So what’s with wanting to see the Chargers lose, Salm?

Well, I reckon that the greater the Chargers’ success, the more vulnerable bedazzled San Diegans will be to a sucker deal in which we cough up tax dollars or public land and services — and more likely all three — to keep the team from moving to City of Industry or Kuwait City or Caprica City* or wherever. The Spanos family — not as rich as God but probably members of the same country clubs — wants the team to make more money, though damned if I can figure out what they want to buy that they can’t buy already. Still, that’s their right. And they can best fatten up the bottom line by feeding it more revenue from a new stadium, one better-designed to accommodate corpulent corporate cats and no-questions-asked expense-account types.

See related: Escondido Chargers? Stadium search is a moving targetSalm: Lose the Chargers? No loss at all

Now, the Spani (or is it, Spanoses?) can certainly afford to build a stadium to house their team, but they’d be damned fools to foot the whole bill if they can snooker someone else into ponying up for a good part of it. That someone else would be, collectively, us. And we’d better do it, or else: If you don’t build it, we will go.

San Diego: Chargers fans before the Oakland game. (Photo by Jesse Arroyo/Chargers.com)

Chargers fans before the Oakland game. (Photo by Jesse Arroyo/Chargers.com)

So go, already. The Chargers are a small, if big-money company that contributes little to San Diego’s economy. They employ relatively few people, and many of those to whom they pay big salaries don’t even live in the area. Tourists are going to come here and spend money anyway, pro football or no pro football. As for local pride and identity with the team … oh, come now; for that, we citizens lay out hundreds of millions of dollars, even while slashing education, social programs and city services?

Actually, I take back the snarky “So go, already.” It’d be great if the Chargers stayed in San Diego — on their own dime. Or, closer to the mark, on their own ten billion dimes, and not ours.

They might even attract some fans who’ve fallen away from the game. If they make a few personnel changes, that is.

What’s Dan Fouts up to these days?

*”Battlestar Galactica” reference. Sorry.

Arthur Salm is an SDNN columnist. Photo courtesy of Chargers.com.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 comments

READER COMMENTS

Comment by: Joe Posted: November 9, 2009, 12:45 pm

Was this a sports article? This dweeb of a writer needs to write more about quantum physics and less about football.

Yawn. I almost fell asleep reading his wordy article.

Comment by: Fred Dickey Posted: November 9, 2009, 2:36 pm

I love it! Salm is absolutely right. I always root for the Chargers’ opponents for exactly the same reason. I AM a football fan, but I am also opposed to rape, and that is what the “Bolts” want to do to the beleaguered taxpayers of San Diego. Have we learned nothing from the John Moores larceny of Petco Park? (As our most recent ex-president tried to say, “Fool me once, shame on you…” How did that go, George?)

Comment by: pr0ject2501 Posted: November 9, 2009, 3:02 pm

Multisyllabic words are difficult for meathead football fans. *chestbump*

Comment by: Gregg Cantor Posted: November 9, 2009, 3:32 pm

This is the most idiotic commentary I have read in a long time. How short sided and immature to wish for Charger losses.

This is free enterprise. Of course the Spanos’s want to make more money. They own an NFL franchise. Hard earned money was spent to purchase the team. They also have the right to be members of what ever country club they desire.

Most of the major cities have new stadiums, which ensures they are in the Super Bowl rotation. Qualcomm is over 40 years old and breaking down. This is a good thing for San Diego. Not just the Super Bowl. How about tourism, hotels, shopping and other revenues that an NFL franchise brings to a major city?

I am not saying that the City of San Diego should accept a bad deal, but it is in their best interest to keep a NFL franchise here. It can be a win win situation.

Comment by: Praise Seitan Posted: November 9, 2009, 11:43 pm

Arthur.

First you called the UT out on all of their dastardly deeds, and I thought you were pretty fierce for having the huevos to do so.

Then, you very pleasantly surprised me when you pointed out what should be obvious–that criminalizing marijuana is stupid because, among other reasons, weed just isn’t that evil.

Next, you extolled the virtues of xeriscapes. Right on, my brother, I’ve got one myself.

But now you have hit the ball out of the park (intentionally incorrect metaphor) because I have long wished for the Chargers to quit bitching about how bad their stadium is because the skyboxes just aren’t luxurious enough and Hit The Road.

If you take requests, will you write one about how dreadful and sad Seaworld is? Their fireworks spew gobs of pollution into the air and the bay and terrify the poor wild birds that live in the bay. (Is anyone over the age of 4 even impressed by fireworks anymore?) And what about the poor orcas and dolphins and the cruelty they endure?

Keep telling it like it is, Arthur. San Diego needs your voice.

Comment by: Lisa Petrillo Posted: November 10, 2009, 7:28 am

At last we have a voice for our side. Let the Chargers eat cake, while people like me drive down the potholed street to my kid’s school where he struggles with 38! other kids in advanced math, and i look at the drought-scorched hills of the city worrying about firefighting budget cuts, and wonder when San Diego’s foolishness will ever end.

Comment by: David Posted: November 10, 2009, 11:17 am

Thanks Arthur for saying what I dislike about the Chargers. Let me add one more comment; The Spanos’ use their winnings to contribute to one political party and they contribute the most of all the NFL franchises. Yet, the party of ’small government’ or ‘less government’and ‘no taxes’ has no problem in using taxpayer money to feed the bonuses and the pockets of the few over the many. By the way,the Texas Rangers still have their stadium built by public funds. Way to go George. Guess, Alex and sons want the same. Yeah, sure, let them eat cake but not cake that can help a whole lot of the less fortunate. Use your own money Chargers/Spanos’ and build your own stadium, wherever you want to put it-just leave our money out of it.

Comment by: Nicole Larson Posted: November 19, 2009, 1:13 pm

No more corporate welfare for the Chargers or any sports team! You’ve got it right, Arthur!

Let’s save our tax dollars for our own needs, not to subsidize billionaire sports teams owners.

Comment by: Gregg Cantor Posted: December 23, 2009, 9:48 am

One last comment for Mr. Salam. Stay off the Charger bandwagon. There is no room for narrow minded thinkers. And when the Charges get a new stadium, you are not welcome.

Post a comment

Presented By: