San Diego politicians react to health care bill’s passage through House

print page
email
share this
comment
bookmark
text size

San Diego: health-care1-400x266Reaction to this weekend’s passage of the health reform bill in the House of Representatives broke along party lines in San Diego’s congressional delegation, as did their votes.

The two San Diego Democrats, Susan Davis and Bob Filner, voted for the bill, known as the “Affordable Health Care for America Act.” Republicans Brian Bilbray, Duncan D. Hunter and Darrell Issa were opposed.

The measure passed 220-215 and now moves on to the Senate.

Davis said it begins to “change the dynamic” to put patients first in the U.S. health care system.

“It’s time to create a system that is more responsive to the patient, because people do not feel embraced by the health insurance industry in our country under the current system,” Davis said. “This bill will provide more access to health care for all Americans, because health care should not be denied, taken away or haggled over at the will of insurance companies.”

The plan toughens regulations on insurance companies, requires most Americans to carry health insurance and large companies to offer coverage. The federal government will provide policies for people who don’t get it from their employer.

Issa and Bilbray warned that the plan will damage the economy.

“This 2,000-page, $1.3 trillion bill will cost Americans more jobs, add to an exploding federal deficit, make it more lucrative for trial lawyers to sue doctors, and take away health care choice,” Issa said. “At the same time, it won’t control the growing cost of health care. The American people are opposed to this flawed bill and I expect they will hold those who ignored their concerns accountable.”

Bilbray said the spending is a bad idea in a time of high unemployment, and coming on the heels of bailouts for the financial and automobile industries.

Neither Filner nor Hunter released statements after the vote.

Before the vote was passed, an amendment was passed to place restrictions on abortion coverage.

Passage in the Senate is uncertain because 60 votes are needed to end debate on an issue.

Republicans are seen as united in their opposition, while Democrats representing traditionally conservative states might not support the so-called “public option,” the issuance of health insurance by the government.

Independent Sen. Joseph Lieberman, of Connecticut, who normally caucuses with Democrats, also is against the public option.

Tags: , , , , , ,

2 comments

READER COMMENTS

Comment by: Tracy Emblem Posted: November 9, 2009, 6:43 am

Leadership Means Addressing the Problem and Working for Solutions

Congressman Brian Bilbray says the health bill in Congress is expensive, bloated and wasteful and publicly asks us: “How will America pay for the Affordable Health Care for Americans Act?” Yet, he does not acknowledge some causes for our escalating health care costs or offer any leadership solutions on how to solve the problem.

First, he fails to acknowledge that insurance companies have absolutely no incentive to keep costs and premiums low because they are not subject to anti-trust laws. The anti-trust laws exist to protect the consumer. Yet in 1945, Congress passed the McCarran-Ferguson Act which has shielded health insurance companies from prosecution for bid rigging, price fixing premiums and creating their own protected markets for almost 65-years.

He also fails to recognize that taxpayers are already paying for health care. The poor have access to health care through Medicaid and the elderly are covered by Medicare. However, for the rest of us, between 1999 and 2008, the yearly premiums for family coverage went up 119 percent, while the inflation rate was only 22.1 percent. Our employers cannot continue to pay for the escalating health care costs and neither can our taxpayers. When we go without health care coverage, taxpayers end up paying the higher price in emergency rooms and for hospitalization instead of for less expensive preventative care.

Bilbray serves on the House Committee on Oversight. However, he has not undertaken any evaluation of where our taxpayer money could be better spent. According to the Center for Defense, the estimated war-related costs in Iraq for the fiscal years 2003 through 2009 totaled $1,631.6 trillion. Where was the Congressman’s leadership in 2006 through 2009 while we have been exporting huge amounts of taxpayer funding to build Iraq?

Bilbray also ignores the hidden cost of our energy policies from burning oil and coal fossil fuels. Recently, in response to a request from Congress, the National Academies of Science released an estimate of our hidden health care costs - $120 billion annually, which does not include the impact of climate change.

Doing nothing is simply not the answer. As more and more people die for not getting treatment and more and more workers and families lose their health care coverage along with their jobs, we need to search for solutions. Governments of all other industrialized countries have found it less expensive to provide comprehensive universal coverage. This is because the real cost containment solution must be employed through a universal public option. The “public option” is is not popular with the insurance industry but its the most cost effective approach for the American taxpayer and public.

The California Nurses Association in conjunction with the Institute of Health & Socio-Economic Policy and a number of advisory boards, outlined a plan worth evaluating for the cost-effective delivery of health care. If we cannot fix the problem through Congress, individual states should have the right to implement their own public plan. We must triage our taxpayer dollars and begin to consider policies which put people and American families first.

[Tracy Emblem is an attorney and a Democratic candidate for U.S. Congress, California's 50th District.]

Comment by: Mark Jasper Posted: November 10, 2009, 1:29 pm

You had best get the folks in Sacramento started on building debtors’ prisons quickly. With almost 23% of California’s “work force” unemployed, under-employed or having given up, you are going to need the room to lock ‘em up.

Post a comment

Presented By: