Offseason state of the Padres

print page
email
share this
comment
bookmark
text size

San Diego: Will Kevin Kouzmanoff, right, stick around or be shipped off in a Padres rebuilding effort. (AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi)

Will Kevin Kouzmanoff, right, stick around or be shipped off in a Padres rebuilding effort. (AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi)

Last Tuesday’s MLB playoff play-in game between the Twins and Tigers brought back tough memories for Padres fans across San Diego.

It was only two seasons ago when a controversial Matt Holliday play-at-the-plate ended the Padres’ season and their World Series hopes. And even if the fans have not moved past that game, it has been evident over the last two years that the team is far removed from that level of competition.

As discussed in the Padres 2009: A season in review, the Padres struggled for the majority of the year. Although they were one of the better teams coming down the stretch, they still finished a depressing 20 games behind the division-winning Dodgers.

The bright side of this experience, of course, is the fact that it gave the team the ability to play their younger players like Kyle Blanks and Everth Cabrera without putting the pressure on them of having the need to perform immediately.

The 2008 and 2009 lack of success for the Padres should not, and will not, fall completely on Bud Black. Black is a well-qualified manager whose lack of success is a result of only being able to play the talent that he is given by the front office.

This has already resulted this offseason in the firing of GM Kevin Towers. When Jeff Moorad took over as CEO and majority owner of the Padres, it was speculated that Towers’ job may be in jeopardy because Moorad would want to install one of “his guys.”

Towers’ time with the organization probably bought him more time as GM, but once the season ended with the Padres in the bottom 10 in the league again, he was as good as gone.

The Padres lack several major pieces but none are more obvious than the need for some genuinely exciting young players.

The Dodgers have Matt Kemp and Clayton Kershaw; the Giants have their trio of Tim Lincecum, Matt Cain, and Madison Bumgarner; the Rockies have Troy Tulowitzki, Carlos Gonzalez and Ubaldo Jimenez; and the Diamondbacks have Justin Upton and Mark Reynolds.

Meanwhile the Padres have an unproven Mat Latos and Kyle Blanks backing up Adrian Gonzalez, the only certified star on the team.

This lacking piece is one of the main reasons Petco Park ranked 20th in attendance in the majors this year. Don’t get me wrong. I know that San Diego is a great sports town but when there is nothing to get excited about, what is going to make them cheer?

The Padres finished in the bottom five in every offensive category besides on-base percentage this year, which needless to say, does not make for an exciting team. Granted, San Diego has much to offer on an average weekday at 7 p.m. But there is no reason that the eighth largest city in the country should have games of fewer than 20,000 fans unless there is something severely wrong with the product.

Spending money on talent

It does seem that the Padres have realized this fact, which is evident by the signing of top draft pick Donovan Tate. Tate fits the mold of the players that I spoke of earlier, and he made the Padres pay for it. New ownership made a splash by signing Tate to a bonus that nearly doubled the previous high given to Matt Bush in 2004 ($6.2 million and $3.15 respectively). Rest assured Padre fans. This top pick has shown a much better chance for success than Bush.

Tate represents more than just a talented player; he represents a new organizational direction. If you look at many of the teams that are in contention every year, one common thread is willingness to spend on the draft and on international free agents.

Up to this point the Padres had not shown the ability or desire to spend and get the top talent, which is reflected by their 29th-ranked farm system. The Padres’ farm system is filled with disappointing players and injury letdowns, but Tate represents a hope for the future of the organization under the open wallet (so far) of Jeff Moorad.

Competing or Rebuilding?

The Padres, and whomever they hire as GM, must make an important decision in the next few month — whether they are competing or rebuilding. For the Friars this will come down to the handling of Gonzalez, Heath Bell, and Kevin Kouzmanoff. If the team decides to rebuild, then they should immediately look to trade veterans for groups of younger players to fill all the holes they have in the organization.

If the Padres do decide they want to win now, in a few years the team will be stocked with talent from one of the worst farm system in the league.

Obviously this does not make for a promising future, so the new GM will have to be absolutely sure where he wants to take the direction of the team, despite the popularity — or lack thereof — of his decisions are among the fan base.

It is possible that Moorad will want to see immediate results from the team and GM. As mentioned in a previous SDNN article, a veteran bat such as Vladimir Guerrero may be just what the Padres’ lineup needs to get going next season. The natural cautionary tale here is to not sign a big name just to sign a big name. For years after their glory days, the Yankees signed washed-up veteran after washed-up veteran (see Carl Pavano) to no success but a higher payroll.

One thing is for sure; the times are changing in San Diego for the Padres. With new ownership, and soon a new GM, the Friars are sure to make a big splash somewhere.

With another top 10 pick in next year’s draft and money to spend from expiring contracts, the team that finished out the 2009 season will not be the one that takes the field in 2010. In Moorad we trust.

Jeff Creps is an SDNN intern and sports contributor.

Tags: , , , , , ,

3 comments

READER COMMENTS

Comment by: YODA777 Posted: October 16, 2009, 4:38 pm

Jeff, that was a very poorly written article. Your observation of the current Padre farm system is way off. It looks like you wrote an article based upon Baseball America’s preseason take on the Padre farm system without actually looking at the minor league teams yourself. Did you know that one of the Padre minor league teams had the best record in all of baseball? Probably did not even look did ya? In 2010, the Padres farm system will be well stocked for pitchers with MLB caliber talent at all levels of their system, something the Padres have never had. In addition, the Padres will have a few bonafide MLB caliber postion players at AA and below [Blanks and Venable came from the Padres minor league system]. The Padre farm system had shown signs of life well before they drafted Tate etc. I am still not sold that Tate will even make it to the major leagues. Did you know the Padres have a pitcher [Luebke] playing on Team USA that does not even get mentioned? How can you not consider Adrian Gonzalez a good young star? I believe Adrian and Kemp are very close in age. Kooz is not that old either. The Padres do not need to get rid of Bell, Gonz and Kooz to rebuild. With the influx of young talent on the way and payroll flexibility the Padres can afford to keep all three of those guys. I might trade Bell at the trade deadline in 2010 if the Padres are out of it but only because Bell is 32 [could bring back a nice haul in prospects] and the Padres have two guys who could assume the closers role Your article is not even worthy of a fan post on the San Diego Union website.

Comment by: Jeff Posted: October 16, 2009, 5:28 pm

Yoda,

Thanks for the input but I’m still going to have to disagree with you. I’ll try to answer your questions in order:

Yes, I do know that. But outside of Jaff Decker and James Darnell the Padres lack true young hitting talent. No one under the age of 22 has shown a ton of power or ability to hit for a high average. I do like Simon Castro but you always have to be somewhat cautious about pitchers, but from what I’ve seen he has a lot of promise.

Luebke is 24 and in AA. I’m not saying that he can’t be good just that he had an ERA of 5.12 last year and that is a big jump to make and not raise a question or two. Next year it will be important to see if he can sustain this momentum.

I actually did call Gonzalez a certified star, so you may want to check that.

I didn’t say you have to trade those 3 just that the new GM would have to look at the possibility if it helped the team. For Kouzmanoff, he is 28, which means that he is in his “prime.” Granted he plays gold-glove defense but I just think that he may be worth more to another team than the Padres.

Hope that helped. I would love to hear your opinion on who the Padres MLB caliber talent is.

Comment by: steve Posted: October 17, 2009, 9:34 am

Jeff-I liked your article. In all of Yoda’s response, he only mentioned one player’s name, which you adequately responded to in your reponse. Yoda-a minor league team with a good record doesn’t hide the fact that no good players might be on the team - since the goal of a minor league player is to get to the next level, other teams lose their top players as they progress.

Post a comment

Presented By: