print page
email
share this
comment
bookmark
text size

Museum’s ‘MIX’ raises questions about San Diego

The future of urban design: Paris vs. San Diego?

Rinehart Herbst installation at "MIX." (Photo by Pablo Mason)

Rinehart Herbst installation at "MIX." (Photo by Pablo Mason)

What is San Diego’s design future? Can architects and designers help make the region more livable?

This summer, the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego’s La Jolla exhibition, “MIX: Nine San Diego Architects and Designers,” asked some of the region’s promising designers to showcase their work.

The museum and its assistant curator, Lucia Sanroman, deserve praise for producing this excellent show. “MIX” offers a sampling of stellar home-grown architecture — Jonathan Segal’s innovative affordable housing in downtown, Sebastian Mariscal’s visceral display of building material dynamics, Public architects James Gates’ and James Brown’s clever conceptualization of an “architecture of the senses,” and Luce et Studios’ intricately detailed array of studio sets aimed toward working with diverse client “stories.”

The exhibition is visually compelling­ with photographs, sculpture, scale models, and drawings. The floor to ceiling montage in the Rinehart Herbst portion of the exhibit catches one’s eye, as does the short video showing Lloyd Russell’s work, which is equally provocative when the sound of an airplane landing near his award-winning R3 building in Little Italy reverberates around the gallery.

Yet as I walked through the exhibition, I was struck by a sense that, while these architects are crafting exciting new designs, their work, as shown, is not unified by a common message that will jolt visitors into thinking about the future of the San Diego region. I realize this was not the intent of this exhibition per se.

It so happens that a gathering of architects halfway around the world has been pondering questions about the future of another urban region. In Paris, French president Nicolas Sarkozy invited 10 architectural teams (not all of them local) to prepare a blueprint for the future­ of a “Grand Paris” project, if you will.

Paris’ great urban design challenge is that the historic center has become an enclave of wealth and architectural beauty while most of the suburbs are placeless high-rise slums housing the working class and immigrant poor. Central Paris has been called “the world’s most elegant gated community.”

San Diego: sdnn-opinionSan Diego suffers a slightly different problem. It has become a region of runaway suburbs, with no real center. We talk about infilling the older urban zones but in the end, many residents continue to prefer the suburbs. Our escalating sprawl now faces into a cone of wildfire potential, making the next wave of suburbs even more unsustainable. We remain wedded to our cars.

In Paris, the architect teams are posing a bold social design agenda that focuses not on individual buildings or even neighborhoods alone but rather, on how design can address the disconnect between the isolated, poor, soul-less suburbs and the center. The architects “macro” solution is built around the use of green belts, canals, parks along rail lines, and airports as “connectors” that would both stitch suburbs to each other and to the center as well as begin to give the lost satellite communities more of a “buzz,” a sense of place.

The San Diego region might well follow the example of Paris. Why not commission local urbanists, architects, and designers to craft a master vision? The current “MIX” show celebrates individual designers looking through their personal microscopes. The choreography of the show evokes this: placing studio displays in separate rooms.

Wouldn’t it be interesting, though, if the museum community, in tandem with local government, might commission architects to envision the future more broadly? Of course, to pull this off we would need the support of politicians, at all levels — the city, county and state.

It’s noteworthy that Paris’ design troubles caught the attention of the nation’s highest elected official­, the President. In San Diego, our elected officials have not consistently supported local design innovation. The decision to allow the construction of the oversized Sunroad building on Kearney Mesa (in violation of airport zoning height limitations set by the FAA), though later reversed, was an embarrassment. Some public officials did not vote in favor of regulating mega-store construction in city neighborhoods.

Architects working on the Paris project have come up with cutting-edge ideas that will reverberate around the planet: reinventing fragmented regions like Paris, using design as a tool to connect isolated communities.

This would be an ideal time to harness the energy of our region’s planners and designers ­at a moment when new projects are slowed by the recession. We should be asking about the regional impact of future designs ­on suburban decentralization, wildfire ecology, and auto dependency.

How can architects counteract an urban culture where city dwellers melt into exurban spaces whose very designs negate any sense of being part of a larger whole?

I urge museum staff, donors and local interest groups to rally behind the example of Paris. Let the excellent “MIX” show open the door for more design exhibitions that address the region’s future.

“MIX: Nine San Diego Architects and Designers” continues through September 6 at the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego, located at 700 Prospect St., in La Jolla. Information: (858) 454-3541; ww.mcasd.org

SDNN contributor Larry Herzog is a writer, Professor and Director of the Graduate Program in City Planning in San Diego State University’s School of Public Affairs.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

READER COMMENTScomment rules | moderation | privacy

Comment by: Jay Shumaker Posted: July 8, 2009, 2:27 pm

Ironic that MoveSanDiego, a transit plan, would connect us, but is partially funded and conceived as mitigation for the traffic to yet more sprawl.

“Temporary Paradise?” has applicable sketches, and suggests a commission of lay citizens, not staff planners employed by the city, to make plans. That way we have a fighting chance of breaking the mold.

Herzog’s essay stimulates a discussion on what is “cutting edge.”

I might suggest that “context” determines what is cutting edge thought, and that progressive thought is only seen as such before it becomes conventional thought.

(Cave painting was progressive once, and maybe still is, …somewhere.)

Conventional French planning becomes cutting edge in San Diego, where we wish for the creation of villages with neighborhood shops, …and for transit.

By the same token, some Parisians go for the latest Los Angeles stuff by Gehry or Hadid, though Dubai makes even LA look passe.

Just imagine, a completely unsustainable premise, Dubai, becoming cutting edge.

Thus, “normal” becomes cutting edge, and we’re back to Aix en Provence.

…and Dubai we just cut off.

-JS

Comment by: michael-leonard Posted: July 8, 2009, 8:50 pm

While I greatly respect Larry Herzog, I must aver from his call for ‘urbanists, architects, and designers to craft a master vision’. From Nolan and Frederick Law Olmsted to the wonderful vision Temporary Paradise? mentioned above, San Diego has had plenty of visions. What it hasn’t had is the political will to actually carry any of them out. And I don’t see any change from that in the forseeable future. To conceive another vision would just be so much wasted creativity.

Comment by: Jay Shumaker Posted: July 9, 2009, 11:49 am

What some San Diegans do not appreciate is the youth of this city compared to Paris or even to East Coast towns in the US. We talk planning every day now, as things clog up. But Parisian clogging began thirty generations ago.

For reference, planning for Balboa Park in a virtually empty city began in earnest only four generations ago. Imagine if George Marston had not stuck to his guns. Or, imagine Manhattan without Central Park.

We are just beginning to clog.

“Political Will” varies under different leaders. Only rarely do politicians act as leaders, thus the call for a citizen commission by Appleyard and Lynch.

A Minister of Culture could focus attention on planning too, if he or she were up to it. The sum of the city-beat staffs of our local papers might add up to such a minister, if they could speak collectively, …not likely, …though plans do hatch in the minds of citizens who read broadly.

But then what? Where to go? How to publish?

Mature citizens will begin to commit to the spirit of “Temporary Paradise?” which captured San Diego. Without commitment there is no plan, …just unrelated accidents and squandered real estate.

-Jay Shumaker
http://www.moveairport.com

Comment by: Christopher Hall Posted: July 10, 2009, 8:47 am

I came across Larry’s article sent to me from afar, so I thought a comment might not hurt:

Trying to mold San Diego for the future, in all the many ways people can come up with, is like trying to contain The Blob.

For instance, starting with walling off the entire bay from Del Mar to San Y, we could hold the entire western flank, then in-filling Mission Valley with stacks of condos and Wal-Marts piled high would act like a sponge to soak up the masses.

From there, consider scraping off all that Kearny-Clairemont Measa low-rise stuff, including that airport for pesky house flies, and get some density going on. Huge globs of San Diegans could wallow in the center-section of the city, spilling out, foaming, and eventually running down into the canyons, filling them like a landfill.

To the east, agreeably, there is the problem of fire safety, and that is because The Blob catches fire — no surprise since it is mostly petroleum based. Perhaps a wall would work to the east like it does along the westrn front, but instead of high rise condos along the beach, they would be more “project” oriented, and be high rise apartments. With proper spacing and Floor Area Ratios, a good firebreak could be made to encircle the San Diego region. These buildings would be concrete, of course, and the desire for sprawl would be contained one and for all.

As The Blob grows, which it has done, it will seep out, so that issue will need to be dealt with in an ongoing manner, and treated like an Un-mitigated Negative Impact, with the focus of CEQA being trained on this one, sole issue, leakage.

Since The Blob just becomes more itself as it grows and produces waste, EIR’s need not be done for projects inside the region as much as they need to be done along the perimeter where the edges of The Blob touch Nature.

-

Comment by: John Hiemstra Posted: July 11, 2009, 1:41 am

I dig the way this writer moves beyond simple “reporting what I saw” to informed analysis of the MIX show and the astute insight of isolation of one creative to the next in the show.

Comment by: INawe Posted: July 12, 2009, 12:56 am

“Yet as I walked through the exhibition, I was struck by a sense that, while these architects are crafting exciting new designs, their work, as shown, is not unified by a common message that will jolt visitors into thinking about the future of the San Diego region. I realize this was not the intent of this exhibition per se.”

I think you sum it up right there. There is a narrative missing from most of the presented work and it is a missed opportunity.

However doesn’t the work of Teddy Cruz speak about the issues that confront San Deigo as a region or did you not see it in the main atrium??? I think the work presented is relevant to not only San Deigo but also to many areas around the world. However you neglect to even mention his name.

I do agree with michael-leonard’s comment and much more needs to be done. We need politicians with more vision and willingness to take more risk to be much more urbanistically progressive with such a young city as compared to Paris… even if its either top down or by empowering communities by providing a grass-roots venue for public dialogue on urban design.

Btw, I’m going to go ahead and say no to Christopher Hall’s suggestions. There are so many things wrong with that comment that all I can say is, “Wow.”

Post a comment