print page
email
share this
comment
bookmark
text size

Chargers re-considering Oceanside as possible stadium location

With discussions in Chula Vista stalled, the team is exploring yet another Oceanside option.

San Diego: Qualcomm Stadium has been the home of the Chargers since 1967. (Courtesy photo)

Qualcomm Stadium has been the home of the Chargers since 1967. (Courtesy photo)

And now, we’re back to Oceanside.

According to Chargers special counsel Mark Fabiani, the organization is now considering a proposal to build a stadium in Oceanside at a defunct drive-in theater site along state Route 76. The developer, Thomas Enterprises, based in Georgia, contacted Fabiani six weeks ago with the idea of building a stadium where the Valley Drive-In once stood.

Thomas Enterprises already has approval to build a 950,000-square-foot open-air shopping center on the 90-acre site. Two years ago, the Chargers turned down an idea to build at Oceanside’s Center City Golf Course. The team has also shot down another developer’s proposal to build close to the existing Qualcomm Stadium in Mission Valley.

“Our project has been in the works for almost five years, to get approved and entitled, which it has been as of November 2008,” said Mel Kuhnel - vice president of West Coast development for Thomas Enterprises. “We’re not putting it on the shelf, not dropping it, just trying to make it bigger and better.”

This proposal is much different than the recent proposal  to redevelopment the Qualcomm site, Fabiani told SDNN. That proposal has since been scrapped by developers.

“[The Qualcomm plan] was six or seven years into project before it started generating any revenue,” he said. “If you’re continuing to play at the Qualcomm site while building a stadium somewhere else, it’s a gigantic financial difference.”

Fabiani said that the proposed stadium project in Chula Vista has hit a snag, saying the short answer is that “we’re on hold because the power plant has not received permission from the state to shut down.” He said until that happens, they can’t move forward.

Both he and Kuhnel said that the sides have to first gain public and political support for the Oceanside project, a process that could take a long time.

“Some of the comments that were made at City Council meeting yesterday were lukewarm to negative, so if that’s the case we certainly don’t want to waste their time or ours on any proposals,” Fabiani said.

See related: Sorting out the Chargers stadium search

Pocket Change: Costs of Qualcomm Stadium

Arthur Salm: Lose the Chargers? No loss at all

In addition, the sides must figure out if there is a financial deal to be made. Fabiani said the principal for Thomas Enterprises, founder and CEO Stanley Thomas, will be meeting with team president and CEO Dean Spanos sometime after the Fourth of July.

The team has said it would consider leaving San Diego if it doesn’t get a new stadium. If the team leaves this year, it would have to pay the city $56.2 million from the 1997 expansion of Qualcomm. The exit amount goes down to $54.6 million next year and to $25.8 million in 2011.

News of the stadium talks was first reported in The San Diego Union-Tribune Friday.

Eric Yates is deputy managing editor for SDNN. E-mail: eric.yates(at)sdnn.com

Tags:

READER COMMENTScomment rules | moderation | privacy

Comment by: Hacksaw: Opportunity lost in Chargers stadium quest Posted: June 25, 2009, 12:31 pm

[...] out the Chargers stadium search | Costs of Qualcomm | Oceanside back in the stadium mix | Salm: No loss if Chargers leave | 619 Sports podcast: Is Oceanside the [...]

Comment by: Chargers talking again with San Diego on stadium Posted: June 26, 2009, 3:55 pm

[...] substantial amount of money if sold. Related: Hacksaw: Opportunity lost in Chargers stadium quest Oceanside back in the mix The costs of [...]

Comment by: San Diego Chargers Oceanside via Mass Transit? « V I D I O T S . U S Posted: July 3, 2009, 5:22 am

[...] media reports are flying that the San Diego Chargers are re-considering a move to Oceanside.This could have greater implications than a “simple” change of location for an NFL [...]

Comment by: Potential developer in Chargers stadium proposal faces multiple lawsuits Posted: July 9, 2009, 3:02 pm

[...] related: Chargers re-considering Oceanside as possible stadium location |  Sorting out the Chargers stadium issues Mark Fabiani, special counsel to the Chargers, and [...]

Comment by: Charger Joe Posted: July 26, 2009, 7:38 am

If we fans can help in anyway to keep the Bolts local, we need to do so now! Entire groups and fan base’s will be destroyed if the Bolts elect to move! When will http://www.Boltalk.com, http://www.BoltBunker.com, http://www.BoltsoftheBlue.com, etc all join forces to get some positive mojo outin the internet. The time is now. Lets not wait until its too late!

Post a comment