<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Diegans angry over Children&#8217;s Pool seals issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue</link>
	<description>San Diego News Network provides breaking news and resources online including: travel guides, sports, hotels, restaurants, classifieds, and a business directory.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>This is just another instance of humans injecting their emotions in an area that nature has been taking care of for an eternity.  If these seals looked like rats, the "friends of the seals" would be first in line to get rid of them.  However, the seals are "cute". I'd be for letting the seals stay, as long as the populations of makos and great whites were returned. Where are the friends of the sharks?  Humans eat far more sharks than sharks eat humans. We have destroyed the balance nature intended.  There are TOO many seals and sea lions, and too few of their predators.  Eventually that overpopulation will destroy them. Thin the herds of seals and sea lions, and it will benefit both them and the humans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just another instance of humans injecting their emotions in an area that nature has been taking care of for an eternity.  If these seals looked like rats, the &#8220;friends of the seals&#8221; would be first in line to get rid of them.  However, the seals are &#8220;cute&#8221;. I&#8217;d be for letting the seals stay, as long as the populations of makos and great whites were returned. Where are the friends of the sharks?  Humans eat far more sharks than sharks eat humans. We have destroyed the balance nature intended.  There are TOO many seals and sea lions, and too few of their predators.  Eventually that overpopulation will destroy them. Thin the herds of seals and sea lions, and it will benefit both them and the humans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJdiver</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>LJdiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>All you have to do is go FISHING! With a valid state fishing license and you are actively fishing you can deter the seals. If anyone tries to stop you use this:

Hunter/Fishing Harassment Law
California Fish and Game Code

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?s...

Section 2009. (a) A person shall not willfully interfere with the participation of any individual in the lawful activity of shooting, hunting, fishing, falconry, or trapping at the location where that activity is taking place.

(b) A violation of this section is an infraction punishable by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).

(c) If any person is convicted of a violation of this section and the offense occurred within two years of another separate violation of this section which resulted in a conviction, the violation is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

(d) This section does not apply to the actions of any peace officer or personnel of the department in the performance of their official duties. This section does not obstruct the rights and normal activities of landowners or tenants, including, but not limited to, farming, ranching, and limiting unlawful trespass.

(e) In order to be liable for a violation of this section, the person is required to have had the specific intent to interfere with the participation of an individual who was engaged in shooting, hunting, fishing, falconry, or trapping.

(f) For purposes of this section, "interfere with" means any action which physically impedes, hinders, or obstructs the lawful pursuit of any of the above-mentioned activities, including, but not limited to, actions taken for the purpose of frightening away animals from the location where the lawful activity is taking place.

http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Marine-Mammals/Seals-an...

Q. Who may deter sea lions or seals?
A. In summary, certain private citizens, marina owners, government officials, and commercial and recreational fisherman may deter sea lions and seals under certain conditions, as described below:
• Private Citizens – Only the owner of the private property (e.g., a dock or vessel) may deter Pacific harbor seals and California seal lions to prevent damage to their private property.
• Marina Owner – Only the marina owner, or an employee of the owner, or an agent of the owner may deter Pacific harbor seals and California seal lions to prevent damage to the marina.
• Government Officials – City, county, state or federal officials or their employees may deter listed and non-ESA-listed sea lions and seals determined to be “nuisance” animals to prevent damage to private or public property, or to protect the public from potential threats.

• Commercial and Recreational Fishermen – Fishermen can deter Pacific harbor seals and California seal lions from damaging gear or depredating catch, only if they are actively fishing.

Any Lifeguard or Law Enforcement Officer can enforce the Code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you have to do is go FISHING! With a valid state fishing license and you are actively fishing you can deter the seals. If anyone tries to stop you use this:</p>
<p>Hunter/Fishing Harassment Law<br />
California Fish and Game Code</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?s.." rel="nofollow">http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?s..</a>.</p>
<p>Section 2009. (a) A person shall not willfully interfere with the participation of any individual in the lawful activity of shooting, hunting, fishing, falconry, or trapping at the location where that activity is taking place.</p>
<p>(b) A violation of this section is an infraction punishable by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).</p>
<p>(c) If any person is convicted of a violation of this section and the offense occurred within two years of another separate violation of this section which resulted in a conviction, the violation is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.</p>
<p>(d) This section does not apply to the actions of any peace officer or personnel of the department in the performance of their official duties. This section does not obstruct the rights and normal activities of landowners or tenants, including, but not limited to, farming, ranching, and limiting unlawful trespass.</p>
<p>(e) In order to be liable for a violation of this section, the person is required to have had the specific intent to interfere with the participation of an individual who was engaged in shooting, hunting, fishing, falconry, or trapping.</p>
<p>(f) For purposes of this section, &#8220;interfere with&#8221; means any action which physically impedes, hinders, or obstructs the lawful pursuit of any of the above-mentioned activities, including, but not limited to, actions taken for the purpose of frightening away animals from the location where the lawful activity is taking place.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Marine-Mammals/Seals-an.." rel="nofollow">http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Marine-Mammals/Seals-an..</a>.</p>
<p>Q. Who may deter sea lions or seals?<br />
A. In summary, certain private citizens, marina owners, government officials, and commercial and recreational fisherman may deter sea lions and seals under certain conditions, as described below:<br />
• Private Citizens – Only the owner of the private property (e.g., a dock or vessel) may deter Pacific harbor seals and California seal lions to prevent damage to their private property.<br />
• Marina Owner – Only the marina owner, or an employee of the owner, or an agent of the owner may deter Pacific harbor seals and California seal lions to prevent damage to the marina.<br />
• Government Officials – City, county, state or federal officials or their employees may deter listed and non-ESA-listed sea lions and seals determined to be “nuisance” animals to prevent damage to private or public property, or to protect the public from potential threats.</p>
<p>• Commercial and Recreational Fishermen – Fishermen can deter Pacific harbor seals and California seal lions from damaging gear or depredating catch, only if they are actively fishing.</p>
<p>Any Lifeguard or Law Enforcement Officer can enforce the Code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eight great things to do under $8</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-3110</link>
		<dc:creator>Eight great things to do under $8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-3110</guid>
		<description>[...] on June 18 and June 25 at 6 p.m. Check out San Diego News Network&#8217;s coverage of the seals here, here, here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on June 18 and June 25 at 6 p.m. Check out San Diego News Network&#8217;s coverage of the seals here, here, here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Simon: Husband and wife debate the seals issue</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-2904</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Simon: Husband and wife debate the seals issue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-2904</guid>
		<description>[...] the ultimate resolution. See related: Bloggers: On the seals of the La Jolla Children&#8217;s Pool San Diegans angry over Children&#8217;s Pool issue Leslie Eastman: Return the Children&#8217;s Pool to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ultimate resolution. See related: Bloggers: On the seals of the La Jolla Children&#8217;s Pool San Diegans angry over Children&#8217;s Pool issue Leslie Eastman: Return the Children&#8217;s Pool to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace Carroll: Husband and wife debate the seals</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>Candace Carroll: Husband and wife debate the seals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>[...] counterpoint See related: Bloggers: On the seals of the La Jolla Children&#8217;s Pool San Diegans angry over Children&#8217;s Pool issue Leslie Eastman: Return the Children&#8217;s Pool to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] counterpoint See related: Bloggers: On the seals of the La Jolla Children&#8217;s Pool San Diegans angry over Children&#8217;s Pool issue Leslie Eastman: Return the Children&#8217;s Pool to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Return the La Jolla Children&#8217;s Pool to Human Children &#171; Temple of Mut</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>Return the La Jolla Children&#8217;s Pool to Human Children &#171; Temple of Mut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>[...] Sherri Lightner, during a recent Channel 10 newscast explain that she wanted to apply the law. Even though she was surrounded by a crowd of hostile, pro-seal activists, she bravely stood her grou.... I applaud her for that, and commend her for being one of the few politicians to show some backbone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sherri Lightner, during a recent Channel 10 newscast explain that she wanted to apply the law. Even though she was surrounded by a crowd of hostile, pro-seal activists, she bravely stood her grou&#8230;. I applaud her for that, and commend her for being one of the few politicians to show some backbone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: water nut 2</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>water nut 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 19:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>It does not matter what anybody decides about the seals at the Children's Pool, when my friends and I are done there will be no seals left. We have divers and watercraft and we are armed with underwater audio harassment devices and seal bombs. When we are through there will be no seals left in the area around the Children's Pool. We also have an army of large dogs and we intend to bring them to the Children's Pool beach before 9 AM and after 6 PM. When we are done there will be no seals left at the Children's Pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not matter what anybody decides about the seals at the Children&#8217;s Pool, when my friends and I are done there will be no seals left. We have divers and watercraft and we are armed with underwater audio harassment devices and seal bombs. When we are through there will be no seals left in the area around the Children&#8217;s Pool. We also have an army of large dogs and we intend to bring them to the Children&#8217;s Pool beach before 9 AM and after 6 PM. When we are done there will be no seals left at the Children&#8217;s Pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gantzel</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gantzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>Temporary use of Children's Pool Beach by dogs to break the Seal Rookery that has developed is a brilliant idea from Sherri Lightner's office.  How this would fare under federal "harassment by humans prohibition" might complicate it a bit.  All this might have been prevented if "polar bear" enthusiasts had kept regular visitations during that period when seals decided that nearby "Seal Rock" was not as comfortable for hauling out.  The rope barrier game developed by the City effectively dedicated this area to the seals and their enormous growth in this area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Temporary use of Children&#8217;s Pool Beach by dogs to break the Seal Rookery that has developed is a brilliant idea from Sherri Lightner&#8217;s office.  How this would fare under federal &#8220;harassment by humans prohibition&#8221; might complicate it a bit.  All this might have been prevented if &#8220;polar bear&#8221; enthusiasts had kept regular visitations during that period when seals decided that nearby &#8220;Seal Rock&#8221; was not as comfortable for hauling out.  The rope barrier game developed by the City effectively dedicated this area to the seals and their enormous growth in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: audrey robb</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>audrey robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>It seems to me the ones in danger are the seals from dirty humans!!  Leave them alone.  And why spend $700,000 on recordings of barking dogs?  You can come here I live and get milli0ns of barking sdogs day and night - for nothing.  They drive all of us nuts.  Yet the Council won't do anything about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me the ones in danger are the seals from dirty humans!!  Leave them alone.  And why spend $700,000 on recordings of barking dogs?  You can come here I live and get milli0ns of barking sdogs day and night - for nothing.  They drive all of us nuts.  Yet the Council won&#8217;t do anything about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrogBlog &#187; Who&#8217;s Letting The Dogs Out?</title>
		<link>http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue/comment-page-1#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>FrogBlog &#187; Who&#8217;s Letting The Dogs Out?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sdnn.com/?p=18203#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/news/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/may/27/bn27seals113925/ http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/may/28/1n28seals005344-banished-beach/?uniontrib [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/news/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue" rel="nofollow">http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-05-29/news/environment/san-diegans-angry-over-seals-beach-issue</a> <a href="http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/may/27/bn27seals113925/" rel="nofollow">http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/may/27/bn27seals113925/</a> <a href="http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/may/28/1n28seals005344-banished-beach/?uniontrib" rel="nofollow">http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/may/28/1n28seals005344-banished-beach/?uniontrib</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
